TIME TRAVEL FOR THE THINKING-MAN
Other Countries: Release Dates
Time
travel is a fascinating subject. The
"what ifs" play with your mind, like going back to alter your future
and the subsequent consequences. The most exciting ideas they pose are the
difficult moral questions. If you had the chance to kill Hitler as a child,
would you? Could you stare into the eyes of an innocent child and pull the gun
trigger?
Then there’s the question of knowing your own timeline. How would you live your life if you knew you
had thirty years to live; no more, no less? Your choices at say twenty-five may
look rather foolish when you’re fifty-five.
‘Looper’,
a very original film from Director and screenwriter Rian Johnson poses these
very questions in an intelligent and thought-provoking way. When you read the synopsis for Looper it
sounds incredibly confusing but in reality it’s a simple idea. Time travel in 2074 is invented and outlawed
but still used by the mob to remove targets whose bodies are difficult to hide.
So they send back their victims thirty years to a designated spot at an exact
time, hands tied and their heads covered in a sack. Waiting for them is a Looper, like Joe
(Joseph Gordon-Levitt), to kill them instantly with a blunderbuss and then dispose
of their body.
Loopers
are paid very well for their services and run by an underworld boss, Abe (Jeff
Daniels). The only downside of a
Looper’s life is that eventually the mob will ‘close the loop’ on them. They will send back the Looper’s self from
the future to he killed by his thirty-year younger version, who will be paid handsomely,
after which he retires to live the rest of his thirty years knowing one day his
time will come.
If
you dare ‘let your loop run’, which means letting your older self get away,
then you are in a whole load of trouble.
This is demonstrated in a particularly nasty sequence when a fellow Looper
Seth (Paul Dano) is tortured, with his older self’s body instantly reflecting
the impact of his younger self’s punishment.
Think healed limb severing and you have the picture.
When
Joe’s older self (Bruce Willis) escapes execution by his younger self, we
discover he is on a mission. He must
find the 2044 child version of a powerful gangster nicknamed ‘The Rainman’ in
order to save the future, or at least his future. This search brings younger Joe into contact
with Sarah (Emily Blunt) living on a peaceful farm with her son Cid. It seems all roads will lead to this farm and
it is here that the future will be determined.
A
couple of things will strike you in this film: Joseph Gordon Levitt, who plays
the younger version of Bruce Willis’s Joe, look very alike, despite being very
different. In fact, it’s uncanny and you
will keep marvelling at Gordon-Levitt’s Willis-like mannerisms. Secondly the crazy flying car chases that you
normally find in these sci-fi films are not the centrepiece of the story.
“I had written the younger part
for Joseph Gordon-Levitt, who, besides being my favorite actor, is also a good
friend,” says Johnson. “When the
possibility of Bruce Willis to play the older Joe presented itself, I got so
excited because Bruce is such a good actor and was so right for the part in so
many ways. It raised a problem, though,
because they really look nothing like each other. We had to find a way to bridge the gap, and
the solution was two-fold.”
“The first
thing was makeup,” Johnson continues.
“Joseph Gordon-Levitt went through nearly three hours of makeup and
prosthetics every single morning to adjust his nose, his upper lip and his
lower lip. There was no way we were
going to make him look like a young Bruce Willis, but we decided we’d pick a
couple of key features and alter them just enough to give the audience
something to grab onto so they could decide to go with it.”
“The other
part – 90 percent of it – is Joe’s performance,” says Johnson. “It’s incredible to watch – he doesn’t
imitate Bruce, he creates a character that feels like a younger Bruce. He’s doing a very specific voice and he took
on a lot of Bruce’s mannerisms. Its
great acting, and a pretty phenomenal thing to see come to life.”
‘Looper’ may
not appeal to those who love their sci-fi action-packed. There are thinking-man moments which require
some patience. But your patience will be
rewarded with this haunting piece of cinema and storytelling which is certainly
a cut above anything we’ve seen in recent time-line.
Good review Susan. The plot makes perfect sense even if it may seem a bit confusing at first, and the suspense draws you in but something just did not mix so well in the end. I didn’t really care all that much for the characters and that’s sort of why the pay-off didn’t do much for me.
ReplyDeleteI agree that we didn't care as much for the characters but I think they were meant to be unlikable characters. I gave it a high rating because it was different and it still worked on many levels. Trust me, when you are a reviewer you live for the movies that add something instead of repeating. Thank you so much for your comments. I really appreciate you visiting the blog.
DeleteI will have to see this. The thing that caught my eye was the younger playing a character that felt like the elder...not just imitates. This I need to experience.
ReplyDeleteYes, its very well done and quite freaky Dee. I've heard good reports back from the general public who have gone on my recommendation too.
ReplyDelete